God Stats On Lotus Servers

[silvio 0]

Should I pull up the Torch incident, its this simple, credentials don't matter and all who think they do obviously phail at life. What it comes down to is this, if you keep making excuses for a God that was created for an age where the Roman empire ruled everyone then you inhibit cultural and scientific development that can lead to actual truths that have been study and criticized over and over again. If an idea can take criticism without having to pull the 'belief' card, then it doesn't hold up. I'm not against practicing well being or being peaceful, but when you look at what you REALLY support when you put that label on yourself as a christian, or a jew, or a Hindu, you are stating that you believe you can only find answers out of that spectrum of thought. When that is said, our advancement as a civilization is dead. I'm sick of all this, and also, I think we need to make it a rule that its two shots per pic he posts of himself. Pace yourself or you'll die. And don't pull the popularity card ruc, you're just some random guy who plays our DoD:S servers. (not that I'm saying people actually like yousuck)

wall of text crits you for 10k

[Mr Pain 0]

arguing this again is like saying that blue is better than red or green is better than yellow, opinions are opinions let's just leave them at that.

[rrrucas 0]

WOW!!

thanks pain...

ive been trying to get that message across...

but nothing like a clear cut response...

[You suck and have no life 203]

WOW!!

thanks pain...

ive been trying to get that message across...

but nothing like a clear cut response...

Except they aren't opinions.

DNA knowledge is a FACT thats measurable and sequenceable

Age of the Universe (13.73 billion) is a FACT and can be measured by WMAP

Age of the Earth (4.5 billion) is a Fact measurable by radiometric dating

Biochemical mechanisms, fossils, speciation, are all observable, repeatable, and testable.

More knowledge added every day at an exponential rate.

Evolution is factual. Genetic mutation is observable. Natural Selection is observable over many species of animals. The evolution of nylon eating bacteria is one example. Nylon is synthetic and man made. So obviously before man invented nylon, there weren't any nylon eating bacteria. One of many examples of evolution thats is observable.

Bible: Written by some dude. None of which are observable, testable, repeatable. Same crap thats been around for 2000+ years. Bible thinks the world is what 6000 years old. 13.73 billion divided by 6000 = an Error of 2,288,333x. I have never seen someone off by a factor of 2 million on ANYTHING. Thats error of saying the distance around the world is 55 feet. Thats the error of saying my car weighs less than ounce. Thats the error of saying the population of America is 150 people. You get my point.

[Mr Pain 0]

just drop it, i'm purely atheist, but repeating arguments is dumb, just forget it, i won't be replying to u so forget it.

[Troispoint 0]

just drop it, i'm purely atheist, but repeating arguments is dumb, just forget it, i won't be replying to u so forget it.

rrrucas sounds like he is a willfully ignorant person since he seems to not even look to our arguments and instead just say that we are irrespectuous to his beliefs. So yeah, people full of shit should be left alone. I agree. lol

[You suck and have no life 203]

I win.

Me 1 : Dumb People 0

I bet rruucuss doesnt even know what DNA stands for. What a newblit. Which also explains why his KDR is 0.51. In other words, far below average. You cant expect someone who's 26 but doesn't understand 9th grade biology/evolution to be skillful in TF2. Its impossible.

[Mr Pain 0]

ouve este gaijo aqui acima é um conas de primeira, n vale a pena discutir com ele, pelo q consegues ver ele até assossia pericia de jogo com inteligencia

[You suck and have no life 203]

ouve este gaijo aqui acima é um conas de primeira, n vale a pena discutir com ele, pelo q consegues ver ele até assossia pericia de jogo com inteligencia

You damn straight. Intelligence = ability to learn quickly, make right decisions. So yes, id rather pick 10 intelligent people off the street to be on my team, than 10 random idiots on my tf2 team. Guess which team is going to learn faster and perform better?

The easier a task, the less advantage a smart person has. Granted TF2 isnt all THAT hard, but still, how many idiots do I see building sentry guns backwards, and in a place where nobody goes?

Eu ganho

[Mr Pain 0]

lololololololololololololol translators are fun, but think of this, not all intelligent ppl are good players, u know this, and many dumb ppl have raw talent when it comes to gaming, u see it's much easier to teach someone something he likes rather than something he doesn't like an thinks won't be useful in his life., i aint lying nor am i attacking u, i'm just giving it to u like it is.

[Camail 1]

Knockout punch time, people function differently, if we all had the same intelligence then we would not have the diverse feelds of science that we do now. This extends to everything else. Seeing as I'm able to agree with both and still use less words makes me e-penis bigger.

[You suck and have no life 203]

lololololololololololololol translators are fun, but think of this, not all intelligent ppl are good players, u know this, and many dumb ppl have raw talent when it comes to gaming, u see it's much easier to teach someone something he likes rather than something he doesn't like an thinks won't be useful in his life., i aint lying nor am i attacking u, i'm just giving it to u like it is.

Nobody said intelligence is the ONLY factor. I'm pretty sure Steven Hawkings would fail at TF2. And yes, I was finding a reason to call rruucuss a newb. The only evidence I have found so far is that 1. hes dumb. 2. He has a low kdr. Two facts is wayyyyy better than making something up.

[Troispoint 0]

You damn straight. Intelligence = ability to learn quickly, make right decisions. So yes, id rather pick 10 intelligent people off the street to be on my team, than 10 random idiots on my tf2 team. Guess which team is going to learn faster and perform better?

The easier a task, the less advantage a smart person has. Granted TF2 isnt all THAT hard, but still, how many idiots do I see building sentry guns backwards, and in a place where nobody goes?

Eu ganho

I just want to point out that to be good at video games you mainly need good ''fluid'' intelligence, ''Fluid intelligence includes such abilities as problem-solving, learning, and pattern recognition.'' Which isnt anything like crystallized : ''Crystallized intelligence is the ability to use skills, knowledge, and experience.'' So your studies in engineering doesn't guarantee you high video games skills at all.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluid_and_cry...us_crystallized

[You suck and have no life 203]

I just want to point out that to be good at video games you mainly need good ''fluid'' intelligence, ''Fluid intelligence includes such abilities as problem-solving, learning, and pattern recognition.'' Which isnt anything like crystallized : ''Crystallized intelligence is the ability to use skills, knowledge, and experience.'' So your studies in engineering doesn't guarantee you high video games skills at all.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluid_and_cry...us_crystallized

I agree. But crystallized intelligence doesn't hurt and can only be helpful. Engineers are pretty good at problem solving, learning, and pattern recognition, no?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Engineering#Problem_solving

[Troispoint 0]

I agree. But crystallized intelligence doesn't hurt and can only be helpful. Engineers are pretty good at problem solving, learning, and pattern recognition, no?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Engineering#Problem_solving

Your studies mainly brought you crystallized intelligence.

[rrrucas 0]

talking about problem solving... try this out given to people trying to get into IT departments in the far east...

http://djallyn.org/archives/46

just on a note... all of the facts you guys talked about I know and believe... in the end I am do have engineering training, and I do believe in facts... so let us go by the facts... one, the talk was about GOD!! not the bible... so, you CANNOT judge by the bible... the facts are the bible WAS written by humans for humans... so there is error... remember human scientists did claim that the world was flat, the center of the universe and a lot more bullshit that does not even get close to error at all because it is ENTIRELY wrong... so if I were to use your school of thought I would say scientist are all retarded, because they get it all wrong... how many hypothesis does it take to actually get it right...

so I conclude, don't blame a guys writing in your moronic belief (or disbelief) in religion... blame it on you own stupidity.. let us just sit and hope that you are not faced with a day were you could be lying in bed with something unexplainable to science as we know it and see who you turn to... ask your engineering professor what he thinks then...

[You suck and have no life 203]

just on a note... all of the facts you guys talked about I know and believe... in the end I am do have engineering training

Proof?

I do believe in facts... so let us go by the facts... one, the talk was about GOD!! not the bible

Show me data or measurable evidence he exists. Do you have a picture of this so called god? Did you take a specimen of him? What composition is he made of? How does he fly through space without fuel? That breaks the laws of thermodynamics which is a FACT.

remember human scientists did claim that the world was flat, the center of the universe and a lot more bullshit that does not even get close to error at all because it is ENTIRELY wrong... so if I were to use your school of thought I would say scientist are all retarded, because they get it all wrong... how many hypothesis does it take to actually get it right...

so I conclude, don't blame a guys writing in your moronic belief (or disbelief) in religion... blame it on you own stupidity.. let us just sit and hope that you are not faced with a day were you could be lying in bed with something unexplainable to science as we know it and see who you turn to... ask your engineering professor what he thinks then...

Nobody is saying scientists never make mistakes. But SCIENCE fixes itself and goes through revisions EVERY SINGLE DAY. It is constantly updated with new data. When Newton came about, calculus and newtonian physics were updated. When Einstein came, relativity was incorporated. Etc Etc. Not just the big scientists, but thousands of scientists around the word are collectively adding more knowledge every single fucking day. And on top of that, people peer review your work, so it gets checked.

Science is far more superior. Even "if" scientists used to think the world was flat, NOW Science on the other hand, NASA sent a fucking shuttle into outer space and took a picture of the earth. Lmao! This shit ain't even on the same level dude. Lets see, the bible has been the same stinking shit for the last 2000 years. Science has leveled up from lvl 1 to lvl 1000. The bible, still lvl 1. No comparison.

[Troispoint 0]

talking about problem solving... try this out given to people trying to get into IT departments in the far east...

http://djallyn.org/archives/46

just on a note... all of the facts you guys talked about I know and believe... in the end I am do have engineering training, and I do believe in facts... so let us go by the facts... one, the talk was about GOD!! not the bible... so, you CANNOT judge by the bible... the facts are the bible WAS written by humans for humans... so there is error... remember human scientists did claim that the world was flat, the center of the universe and a lot more bullshit that does not even get close to error at all because it is ENTIRELY wrong... so if I were to use your school of thought I would say scientist are all retarded, because they get it all wrong... how many hypothesis does it take to actually get it right...

so I conclude, don't blame a guys writing in your moronic belief (or disbelief) in religion... blame it on you own stupidity.. let us just sit and hope that you are not faced with a day were you could be lying in bed with something unexplainable to science as we know it and see who you turn to... ask your engineering professor what he thinks then...

So your a theist without a religion? So tell me, lets start by the simplest question, how do you know God exist?

[Camail 1]

Anyone want to guess who will ragequit first?

[Troispoint 0]

Anyone want to guess who will ragequit first?

Im pretty sure its going to be rrrucas

[rrrucas 0]

Proof?

Show me data or measurable evidence he exists. Do you have a picture of this so called god? Did you take a specimen of him? What composition is he made of? How does he fly through space without fuel? That breaks the laws of thermodynamics which is a FACT.

Nobody is saying scientists never make mistakes. But SCIENCE fixes itself and goes through revisions EVERY SINGLE DAY. It is constantly updated with new data. When Newton came about, calculus and newtonian physics were updated. When Einstein came, relativity was incorporated. Etc Etc. Not just the big scientists, but thousands of scientists around the word are collectively adding more knowledge every single fucking day. And on top of that, people peer review your work, so it gets checked.

Science is far more superior. Even "if" scientists used to think the world was flat, NOW Science on the other hand, NASA sent a fucking shuttle into outer space and took a picture of the earth. Lmao! This shit ain't even on the same level dude. Lets see, the bible has been the same stinking shit for the last 2000 years. Science has leveled up from lvl 1 to lvl 1000. The bible, still lvl 1. No comparison.

Again... you keep talking about the bible... but ok...

now to really piss you off... let us use SCIENCE...

if you call yourself a scientist, you cannot disprove anything if you don't know of it... because if you could, then a tree falling in the middle of the jungle where no one sees or hears it fall, does not fall at all... so, very simply, you cannot disprove something without testing it first... crappy logic, but ultimately true... if you were to say God does not exist you would have to make an experiment... now, I ask you... where are the facts that he does not exist... do an experiment, hypothesis, etc... then let me know what you come up with... Since science, by its very nature, is never capable of proving the non-existence of anything, one can never accurately claim that science has proven God doesn't exist...

just an example of this so you people can understand... there is no SCIENTIFIC proof for longing for, or for love... does that mean that there is no love, or feelings for that matter... is it explained to you as simple interactions in the brain?? then God could exist the same way... grab a believer and mention God and you will get interaction in the brain also...

so simply put... you are coming with false arguments... when you have a good one... let me know...

[You suck and have no life 203]

Again... you keep talking about the bible... but ok...

now to really piss you off... let us use SCIENCE...

if you call yourself a scientist, you cannot disprove anything if you don't know of it... because if you could, then a tree falling in the middle of the jungle where no one sees or hears it fall, does not fall at all... so, very simply, you cannot disprove something without testing it first... crappy logic, but ultimately true... if you were to say God does not exist you would have to make an experiment... now, I ask you... where are the facts that he does not exist... do an experiment, hypothesis, etc... then let me know what you come up with... Since science, by its very nature, is never capable of proving the non-existence of anything, one can never accurately claim that science has proven God doesn't exist...

just an example of this so you people can understand... there is no SCIENTIFIC proof for longing for, or for love... does that mean that there is no love, or feelings for that matter... is it explained to you as simple interactions in the brain?? then God could exist the same way... grab a believer and mention God and you will get interaction in the brain also...

so simply put... you are coming with false arguments... when you have a good one... let me know...

You cant prove he EXISTS.

But funny thing is, all the things we see, hear, measure, test, observe suggests he doesn't exist. We have sent satellites to far regions of outer space. We have seen things smaller than cells, and beyond nanometers. We have completely decoded our DNA, down to every LETTER. We have sent particles to 0.99999 times the speed of light with the Large Hadron Collider. We have seen things as big as the universe and as small as the quantum level. We have mapped out the evolutionary path of humans and most animals. Out of all this X1000 more, we don't see GOD.

You are stupid. Go home. You aren't an engineer. Taking Engineer 101 doesn't make you an Engineer. Thats just an entry course where you build paper bridges and shit. You dont have an Engineering degree. I do. I invent drugs and medical devices. The food and drug administration consults with me. You lose and you fail. Its like me bench pressing and 315, and you still benching the bar. Its like me having a KDR of 1.77, and you having a KDR of 0.56. Sorry but you ain't on the same level.

[Mr Pain 0]

To rrrucas: science doesn't have to prove he doesn't exist, because there is no proof that he does exist, so until proven that he exists he doesn't.

To yousuck: Stop classifying ppl due to their school accomplishments, and their gaming skillz. And i'm not even gonna talk about the FDA.

[Troispoint 0]

To rrrucas: science doesn't have to prove he doesn't exist, because there is no proof that he does exist, so until proven that he exists he doesn't.

To yousuck: Stop classifying ppl due to their school accomplishments, and their gaming skillz. And i'm not even gonna talk about the FDA.

NOOOOOOOO!!! Looking at them arguing with their stupid reasoning is much funnier

[Mr Pain 0]

NOOOOOOOO!!! Looking at them arguing with their stupid reasoning is much funnier

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha, this made me laugh for real lol