Staff Adept 1 #1 Posted May 2, 2008 I reckon Canoneers are slightly better, since their very good at hitting multiple enemies and buildings despite a slower fire rate. They overkill more too. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
the necromancer 2 #2 Posted May 2, 2008 sniper scope 'nuff said Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
samuraispirit 0 #3 Posted May 2, 2008 Musketeers. They EVER hit the enemy but the canoneers not. And the canoneers have problems to shoot enemys who are on the ground of a hill and the canoneers standing on top of it. And the musketeers are faster at running I think. And the musketeers can get explosions so they get more blast power. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
reNekRoManT 3 #5 Posted May 2, 2008 Snipers better than cann Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Speedy 11 #6 Posted May 2, 2008 sniper scope'nuff said I don't think there is 'nough said. They are both useful. I won't vote for either. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
the necromancer 2 #7 Posted May 7, 2008 however, a cannoner's innate is pretty damn awesome... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Battle Realms fan 0 #8 Posted August 11, 2008 I prefer musketeers. Because most of the missle units miss when attacking Issyl. They are the only units that can shoot through Issyl with an instant hit Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Light 2 #9 Posted August 13, 2008 i would also say MUSKS their inste is awsome Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
reNekRoManT 3 #10 Posted August 13, 2008 but snipers not so good without cannoneers Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rockstar 0 #11 Posted August 13, 2008 but snipers not so good without cannoneers i prefer cannoneers as destroying buildings Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quotetheraven90 1 #12 Posted August 22, 2008 I vote for musketeer. They're deadly unit when in a mass group. If they upgraded with a sniper scope....that's just incredible! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mekani 0 #13 Posted August 22, 2008 I vote musketeers. With sniperscope, they have a good range and can knock people off of their horses with it, and their attack is pretty good for taking out buildings. I'd say that when they're massed, they're better than massed cannoneers. The enemy can't even dodge the bullets because they instantly hit, making them good against Koril or the Shale Lord. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
§{Æ’ŗỡşŦbļǺđè}§ 0 #14 Posted August 22, 2008 cannons with smoke bombs ftw..it greatly lowers the damage of the enemy and make them stop wat they r doing too..so i vote for cannons Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
reNekRoManT 3 #15 Posted August 22, 2008 mines can easy see and kill Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mekani 0 #16 Posted August 23, 2008 Mines kick samurai butt. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
reNekRoManT 3 #17 Posted August 23, 2008 Mines kick samurai butt. yes i agree mines good if enemy contattack u Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Samuronin 2 #18 Posted March 2, 2009 Musketeers. Cheaper and a little more useful than Cannoneers. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PWNAGE 0 #19 Posted March 3, 2009 Cannoneers, mainly cause i go for enemy bases ASAP Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Team_fadel 0 #20 Posted March 3, 2009 Cannoneers better Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WolfMasterZX 0 #21 Posted April 6, 2009 both are useful ... to be honest I won't vote to this poll Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
firsthonorboy 1 #22 Posted April 7, 2009 I like musketeers better for many reasons. First, they never miss unless you're using the blast shot battlegear. Second, they're quite effective against units, especially samurai and ronin. Third, the blast shot battlegear improves their effectiveness against buildings immensely, so that advantage of the cannoneers is now useless. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nathrach 0 #23 Posted April 19, 2009 Well, I prefer Musketeers due to its "Instant Hit" innate ability, in which every missile attack hits without fail. Therefore, Musketeers with Sniper Scope upgraded with Vital Points and Reinforced Plating make it a good unit on defending. However, if you want it offensively-minded, go for cannoneers. Cannoneers are good also defensively due to mines, and offensively due to Smoke Bombs. If you want to counter ranged defenders, go for it. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
†okyo 4 #24 Posted April 19, 2009 my choice is to preer muskeeter cuz they fast and instant hitting units ... but the fact is i dont really use serpent .. im wolf user.. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Petar 5 #25 Posted January 22, 2010 Both are good but cannoners are more usefull Musketeers actually do good damage only to units who are weak on exp... but to any other units they do redicilous damage even with upgrade. Canoners do more and with upgrade for range they have slightly less range than a sniper skope... besides they hit multiple units, both of thier BG-s are insane and they are E armor on magic AND explossive making them a perfect unit for a lotus enemy... A little offtopic: once I was playing with 3 friends of mine and we were like 2v2 I was serpent my opponents lotus.... My army was in the down right corner while my village in the upper right one - > tha map was medium I guess... anyway the enemy comes with mass warlocks and unclean with mounted geishas and 2 zymeths right to my ricefield... I had to run to my village and fight without my ally... hw was not responding or somethin and I stopped them!!! dont ask how however using about 35 units to defeat about 70 expecially lotus ones I think is not an easy task.... So serpent pwns if played right Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites